Reconceptualizing Privacy

ken anderson

ken anderson

Principal Researcher, Intel Corporation

liz keneski

Liz Keneski

Head of Privacy Research, Facebook Inc.

peter levin

Peter Levin

Principal Researcher, Autodesk

elena o'curry

Elena O’Curry

UX Research Manager for Safety, Privacy & Accessibility, Uber

jeff sokolov

Jeff Sokolov

Designer & Researcher, IBM Watson Health

Saturday, November 9, 4:30–5:45, RISD Auditorium

Algorithmic systems are increasingly integrated into the physical and digital infrastructures of our lives. The borders of privacy are being pushed and redefined, provoking new debate about what privacy is. All corporations claim privacy is important, but what does that mean? Panelists will consider what privacy might look like or mean when individuals are tied into multiple networks, both human and AI.

About the Panelists

Agency & Innovation

melissa cefkin

Melissa Cefkin

Principal Researcher, Alliance Innovation Lab Silicon Valley

dawn nafus

Dawn Nafus

Senior Research Scientist, Intel Labs

michael littman

Michael Littman

Professor of Computer Science & Co-Director of the Humanity Centered Robotics Initiative, Brown University

Clapperton Chakanetsa Mavhunga

Clapperton Chakanetsa Mavhunga

Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society, MIT

Heli Rantavuo

Heli Rantavuo

Senior Insights Manager, Growth Opportunities Mission, Markets Business Unit, Spotify

Sunday, November 10, 4:00–5:30, RISD Auditorium

Robotics, machine learning, and other technologies are provoking new hopes and fears about human agency. Tropes of the charismatic lone innovator, whether hero or villain, are also starting to lose popular currency. When we acknowledge that the agents of the built world are not just people who call themselves “innovators” but are made up of many kinds of people, and physical materials, new questions arise. How do issues of responsibility, accountability, attribution, and even regulation get solved in situations of distributed agency? What new stories about agency need to be told?

About the Panelists

Agency & the Climate Emergency

makalé cullen

Makalé Faber Cullen

Urban Soils Fellow, Anthropocene, Urban Soils Institute

Györgyi Gálik

Györgyi Gálik

Lead Advisor, Architecture and Built Environment Team, Design Council

dan lockton

Dan Lockton

Chair of Design Studies & Director of the Imaginaries Lab, Carnegie Mellon University

mike youngblood

Mike Youngblood

Principal, The Youngblood Group

Monday, November 11, 9:00–10:30 am, Washington Building – Gathering Space

What is ethnographers’ role in dealing with catastrophic climate crisis? Should we be exploring people’s experiences of change, trying to use our insights to help drive individual and collective action at scale through organizations, or helping civil society deal with the consequences? This panel will examine some of these tensions and responsibilities, and the value that ethnographic practice can bring to one of the biggest issues for our collective futures.

About the Panelists

Representation & Representative-ness: Experts, Expertise, and Ethnographic Practice

amber greene

Amber Greene

Experience Research & Service Design, Cityblock Health

jordan kraemer

Jordan Kraemer

Research Associate, Implosion Labs, LLC

donna lanclos

Donna Lanclos

Anodyne Anthropology LLC

ruchika muchhala

Ruchika Muchhala

Consultant/Filmmaker, Third Kulture Media

autumn sanders foster

Autumn Sanders Foster

Founder, Quire Consulting

Monday, November 11, 11:00 am–12:30 pm, Washington Building – Gathering Space

Ethnographers take pride in representing people’s voices with fidelity, empathy, and deep contextual understanding. But our work can end up reinforcing a distinction between people who “have experience” that we study for insights and people who “have expertise” to use, shape, and monetize that experience. We’ll tackle a range of core questions:

As organizations increasingly value representations of “user” or “customer” experience, what responsibilities come with this role? To what extent are we confronting the ways that the anthropologist on the project gets used to distancing people from their own expertise about their everyday lives? When we present our research and recommendations to clients and communities, are we asked about whether the people we did our research among are “representative”? What does “representation” mean, in which contexts? How has that idea been used to disenfranchise people? Who are the people who are listened to as “representative?”

In some cases, emphasizing proportionate representation, for example, overlooks ways some users or people are disproportionately affected by certain practices or technologies, just as marginalized or minoritarian groups. This panel brings together practitioners working across many different sectors (health, finance, media, education) to discuss their own experiences around representation and “representativeness” within their research and work. How do we make visible those who are not in the room?

About the Panelists